-
Website
http://www.angelamaiers.com -
Original page
http://www.angelamaiers.com/2009/09/the-future-of-reading-the-problem-is-not-the-books.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
servantofchaos
2 comments · 8 points
-
loonyhiker
2 comments · 1 points
-
Damien Riley
9 comments · 1 points
-
RecessDuty
3 comments · 1 points
-
larryferlazzo
3 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
My Manifesto for 2010 - A Work in Progress
5 days ago · 4 comments
-
The Portable Office with The Brand Chef: Andrew B. Clark
6 days ago · 2 comments
-
Merry Christmas - May All Your Elves Pull Through
3 days ago · 1 comment
-
Creative Commons is Key to Sharing
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
<strong><strong><strong><strong>Capturing Classroom Habitudes and Sharing Them</strong></strong></strong></strong>
1 week ago · 3 comments
-
My Manifesto for 2010 - A Work in Progress
There are endless arguments for and against readers workshop; there are countless arguments for an against a canon. I think there is much wisdom in the sensible center. We should want children to love reading enough to seek out their own books; we should recognize as teachers our obligation to familiarize children with the best of what has been said and written. To suggest we should do one or the other exclusively strikes me as another false dichotomy in a field that is already burdened by false dichotomies.
We know that there is no such thing as the Indispensible Book, the thing that you are not educated if you have not read. But surely we can't get to the point where we are unwilling to specify any reading at all. Not choosing is also a choice: If you are unwilling to say "this is essential" you are effectively saying "nothing is essential." At that point, the pendulum has swung too far.
Someone sent me a list of the 101 books the College Board recommends every college-bound kid should read. I'll confess right now that I have only read about 2/3rds. But interestingly, I'm familiar with every one of them. If allusions are made to Pride and Prejudice, Captain Ahab or Tom Joad, for example, the references don't go over my head. This may sound like trivia, but it's not. Cultural allusions, like essential background knowledge, are the glue of language. It is the stuff that keeps us from saying "I read it, but I don't get it" or staring blankly when educated people speak to one another.
For me, the bottom line is that if we wish for children to become good readers and enjoy a lifelong love of books, we need to cast a much wider net. We need to immerse children not just in books -- chosen or assigned -- but give them the broadest, deepest education possible, including science, history, art, music, literature and more. Educated people tend to be readers; uneducated people tend not to be. A poorly educated child who loves books is still a poorly educated child.
If we are committed to giving children the best and broadest education possible, I tend to think the issue of choosing or assigning books would quickly become irrelevant.
Robert Pondiscio
Core Knowledge
ANOTHER wonderful post, Angela! I am SO sharing this with my colleagues!
Do you find that assessment plays a key role within all of this? When teachers are encouraged to move in new directions and study the effect of what they are doing on student performance, it's often very validating. In my experience, this creates a sense of safety as well, reassuring us that change is accomplishing what we really want it to or that we're able to pinpoint which pieces of our approach need to shift in order to get there. Often, when I or those I work with hesitate to try something new, making a commitment to studying the effects helps everyone move forward in an informed way, which provides comfort.
You bring up several very important points. Many teachers were in the "blue bird" group. our own identities as readers were formed by the speed, neatness, and perfection we performed the task. This is a difficult image to let go of, yet as models of "real reading" we must be able to show kids the challenges as well as the joys of the literacy.
I absolutely think assessment plays a large role in shaping the literacy conversations. Teachers may not seek to "teach to the test", yet it is something that is always on the mind. I so agree that if we can help teachers see that deep, engaged reading will lead to performance we can provide a sense of comfort for them to continue the conversations most needed in literacy.
With leaders and learners like you, I am assured this revolution will happen. It is slow and painful at times, but the rewards far outweigh the challenge!
Acceptance is bliss isn't it? Just when I think I have gotten something down pat, it changes. This is both the pleasure and the pain of literacy! I have learned now just to enjoy the incredible, and "off-balanced" journey!